Recently in 2010 Primary Category

VOTE!

user-pic
Vote 0 Votes Favorites

Dear Friends;


As we come down to the wire on tomorrow's June 8, 2010 election, we've seen enormous amounts of money being spent on ballot measures that will have a significant impact on the future of our state.
 
With a wide-range of issues at stake-- from the conducting of elections to how we get our electricity, we want to make sure you have the real, unbought, objective analysis and suggestions of a progressive point-of-view on these issues.
_____________________________________________________
 
For those who live in Santa Barbara County, and in Carpinteria, specifically, this election will determine whether another oil company is going to be able to get around existing laws for its own financial benefit and at the expense of the quality of life and protection of our coast. Measure J is a bald-faced attempt by VENECO oil company to circumvent existing environmental and land-use laws to allow drilling for as long as the company wants and in any manner they want. Hard-to-believe, but true.
 
But they're not alone, there are two other initiatives that are also for the benefit of multi-million dollar corporations---again at the expense of you and me, the public. Prop. 16 (the PG&E monopoly and anti-green energy initiative) has been purchased by PG&E for over $40 Million. We must beat that back and tell PG&E that they can't subvert democracy, energy independence and consumer protections.
 
The same is true for Prop. 17--which Mercury Insurance has funded, almost as exclusively as PG&E has done with 16), in order for it to be able to make huge profits,.
 
The single element that is so interesting is that these measures claim to be exactly the opposite of what they are. WE NEED TO SAY NO TO 16 and 17.

Prop. 14, the "open primary" initiative forces candidates to raise huge amounts of cash to campaign to all of the voters in the state.  This potentially seals the deal that campaigns require wealthy candidates or corporate sponsorship.  

On the other hand, Prop. 15, "public financing," helps candidates from all walks of life run a campaign that can reach the public without depending on funding from wealthy or corporate interests.

So I want to make sure you're aware of this year's Speak Out California Voter Guide which covers the five statewide initiatives on the ballot.

In the guide please note the various recommendations from seven of the state's leading non-partisan and progressive groups, in addition to the recommendations of Speak Out California, which are:

Proposition 13, the Earthquake Retrofit Property Tax initiative: No position.

Proposition 14, the "Kill the Parties Initiative": NO

Proposition 15, the "End Corporate Financed Elections Initiative": YES

Proposition 16, the "PGE Initiative": NO

Proposition 17, the "Mercury Insurance Initiative": NO


Thank you ,



Signature
Hannah-Beth Jackson

Comments (0)
There is a mailer reaching California's voters titled Vote for a Greener California, with a label that says "Californians Vote Green."

This mailer is deceptive.  It says to vote for Proposition 16, the "PGE Initiative."  This is a paid endorsement, and is designed to trick people into thinking there is an environmental reason to vote for a proposition that actually keeps people from being able to buy green energy. The California Secretary of State's website shows that PGE paid $40,000 to be part of this mailer:  (While you're there, look how much they paid for "Petition Circulating.")

03/11/2010CALIFORNIANS VOTE GREEN SLATE MAILER PAYMENT$40,000.00

Please do not be fooled by this mailer.  Speak Out California recommends voting no on Proposition 16.  It is a proposition that enforces PG&E's monopoly if it passes. 

Others have noticed this mailer.  At Calitics see Warning: Fraudulent(?) Mailer, and Prop. 16, Slate Mailers, and Voting 'Green' at Infospigot.




Comments (1)
Speak Out California's positions on the ballot propositions for the June election are as follows:

Proposition 13, the Earthquake Retrofit Property Tax initiative: No position.
Proposition 14, the "Kill the Parties Initiative": NO
Proposition 15, the "End Corporate Financed Elections Initiative": YES
Proposition 16, the "PGE Initiative": NO
Proposition 17, the "Mercury Insurance Initiative": NO


Voter Guide:

In keeping with Speak Out California's long-standing tradition, we're again providing progressive voters with a one-stop guide to the upcoming election. We believe it is important to cut through all the hype and excessive corporate money being spent to mislead and thus persuade our voters on what each of these measures does or doesn't do.

Watch, in particular, for Props 16 and 17 -- they are each funded by billion-dollar corporations to pad their own pockets, to the detriment of the people. Prop 16 is solely financed by PG&E to keep competition, especially alternative energy companies, from challenging their monopoly of local energy service. They call it "the right to vote" but it's anything but. 

Proposition 17 is a ploy by Mercury Insurance to be able to raise rates. They've single-handedly funded this measure -- from signature gathering to commercials claiming they're going to lower rates, when what they are really going to do is raise them on the least able to pay, such as people who miss a payment.

Feel free to share the information with your friends. OR better yet, please click here to join us and continue receiving progressive news and analysis from a reliable and independent source.


The Speak Out California June 2010 primary election printable voter guide can be downloaded by clicking this link.

Vote Progressive June 8!

(Note, click the name of each org at the top of the chart below to go to their endorsement page.)


Comments (0)
Roy Ulrich of the California Tax Reform Association and Richard Holober of the Consumer Federation of California have written an important op-ed on the need to restore the Fairness Doctrine. They argue that the unlimited funds that big corporations can throw at California's ballot initiatives -- props 16 (the "PGE Initiative") and 17 (the "Mercury Insurance Initiative") in particular -- are stifling the ability of opponents of these measures to be heard. From their op-ed,titled California Needs The FCC To Restore The Fairness Doctrine,

Neither was able to get the legislature to do their bidding, so they hired political consultants, paid millions of dollars to gather signatures, and proceeded to put these self-serving measures on the ballot. Now, they are flooding the airwaves with well-crafted bunk. ... a core principle of the First Amendment's guarantee of free speech is the ventilation and airing of opposing points of view. There can be little doubt that the effect of broadcasters' refusal to provide under-funded campaigns free response time since the repeal of the Fairness Doctrine for ballot measures in 1992 has been to increase the amount of one-sided information voters receive before entering the voting booth. This is hardly the kind of open and free debate the framers of our Constitution had in mind when they wrote the First Amendment.
It is time to restore the Fairness Doctrine so the non-wealthy can reach the public too.

Comments (0)
Proposition 16 is being sold -- and sold, and sold, and sold -- as a "right to vote."  The Prop 16 website makes it sound so reasonable,

"It requires voter approval before local governments can spend public money or incur public debt to get into the electricity business."

So reasonable!  But that isn't really what Prop 16 does.  Proposition 16 is entirely financed with million of dollars from one company - PG&E - and it is intended to perpetuate their monopoly.  

Here is the background: Currently municipalities can choose to form Community Choice Aggregation Projects that let communities buy power for their citizens, instead of using PGE as an intermediary.  The result is that people can buy power at a lower cost, and can choose to buy a mix with more renewable energy.  PGE, of course, doesn't like that.

Prop 16 takes away a community's right to choose to buy their own power and imposes a 2/3 vote requirement.  A community can usually gather a majority to make such decisions but a 2/3 requirement means that PG&E can swoop in and spend some money to get a minority to oppose such a decision, and kill it.  

California already has a 2/3 requirement to pass a budget, and we know how that is working.  Democracy is suppressed and budgets can't pass.

We know monopolies don't work in our society.  While we're trying to create competition to encourage the development of clean, renewable energy sources, PG&E is taking your rate-payer dollars to try to squelch that effort.  PG&E wants to stay a monopoly, continue to use dirty fuels which cause climate change and keep the competition out.  That's not very democratic now, is it?

We need to say no to big corporations that use their money (rate/taxpayer in this case, actually) to bully us with phony claims that really serve to perpetuate fat payouts to executives while undermining consumer choice.
 
Let's not be deceived. Spread the word that Prop 16 is about protecting corporate fat-cats, not you and me, not democracy, not fair competition.

Comments (0)
The other day I wrote that Proposition 17 -- on the ballot in June -- is known as the "Mercury Insurance Initiative" and that I'll explain that later.  

Well, it's later.

The Mercury Insurance company has single-handedly spent millions of dollars to put Proposition 17 on the ballot.  Now they are about to spend millions more advertising it.  The proposition allows insurers to penalize consumers for missing one payment or having a lapse in car insurance coverage.  So if you stopped driving - couldn't afford it, left the state, etc. - or miss a payment, your car insurance rates skyrocket.

Mercury Insurance is going to spend millions of dollars to advertise an initiative that will cost people a ton of money by claiming it saves people money?  Right - that's why they're spending millions on it, to save you money rather than to make themselves a bundle.  (My bet - in this current economy they will also claim that it "creates jobs.  Just a hunch.)

The Campaign for Consumer Rights has a Stop Prop 17 website, with a great video, "Mercury Insurance Wants You To Pay More For Your Car".  Here is is for your viewing pleasure:



Comments (0)
Speak Out California will be focusing between now and June on the ballot initiatives and issues that will be on the June ballot.  We will provide in-depth analysis of each as well as overviews.  We'll also be doing regular updates on who's funding what and how much is being spent.

Proposition 13: Property Tax: New Construction Exclusion: Seismic Retrofitting.  This June ballot initiative is named "Proposition 13" but it is not related to the 1978 initiative that cut property taxes.

This initiative prohibits tax assessors from re-evaluating taxes on new construction that is done for the purpose of seismically retrofitting - making the building earthquake-safe.  The construction would not result in increased property taxes until the building is sold.

What changes: According to the Legislative Analyst's Office, currently some properties are exempt for 15 years from tax increases based on earthquake retrofits.  Upgrades on unreinforced masonry buildings get a 15-year exclusion while other buildings are excluded until sold.

The League of Women Voters has no recommendation on this proposition.

Comments (1)

June Ballot Initiatives

user-pic
Vote 0 Votes Favorites

The June election is coming up and several initiatives have qualified for the ballot. We will be writing about them here at Speak Out California as the election draws near.

The Secretary of State's website shows that the following initiatives have qualified for the June ballot:

Proposition 13: Limits on Property Tax Assessment. Seismic Retrofitting of Existing Buildings. Legislative Constitutional Amendment.

Proposition 14: Primary Election Process Reform. Greater Participation in Elections.

Proposition 15: California Fair Elections Act.

Proposition 16: Imposes New Two-Thirds Voter Approval Requirement for Local Public Electricity Providers. Initiative Constitutional Amendment.

Proposition 17: Allows Auto Insurance Companies to Base Their Prices in Part on a Driver's History of Insurance Coverage. Initiative Statute.

Proposition 16 is known as "the PGE initiative" and Proposition 17 as the "Mercury Insurance initiative" -- but we'll get into that later.

The not-yet-final state voter guide is available here.


Comments (0)

2010 Primary: Monthly Archives

OpenID accepted here Learn more about OpenID
Join Our Mailing List
Email:




About this Archive

This page is an archive of recent entries in the 2010 Primary category.

2010 General Election is the previous category.

Action Alerts is the next category.

Find recent content on the main index or look in the archives to find all content.